Appendix I: Noise Element Data
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Projected Traffic Noise Contours-Freeway (10 Lanes)
Figure 2: Projected Traffic Noise Contours-Freeway (6 Lanes)
Figure 3: Projected Traffic Noise Contours-Expressway (6 Lanes)
Figure 4: Projected Traffic Noise Contours-Urban Arterial (6Lanes)
Figure 5: Projected Traffic Noise Contours-Arterial Highway (4 Lanes)
Figure 6: Projected Traffic Noise Contours-Major Highway (4 Lanes)
Figure 7: Projected Traffic Noise Contours-Mountain Arterial (4 Lanes)
Figure 8: Projected Traffic Noise Contours-Secondary Highway (4 Lanes)
Figure 9: Projected Traffic Noise Contours-Collector Street (2 Lanes)
Figure 10: Existing Railroad Noise Contours-Coronita Area
Figure 11: Existing Railroad Noise Contours-Near Van Buren and Limonite
Figure 12: Existing Railroad Noise Contours-North of Palm Desert
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Noise Measurements within Riverside County
Table 2: Measured Traffic Noise Level
MEMOS
Determining and Mitigating Non-transportation Noise Source Impacts
Determining and Mitigating Traffic Noise Impacts to Residential Structures
Potential Studies Requiring Input from Department of Public Health
| Table 2 Measured Traffic Noise Level | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roadway Segment | ADT | Centerline to 70 Ldn, feet | Centerline to 65 Ldn, feet | Centerline to 60 Ldn, feet | Ldn (dBA) 50' from outermost lane |
| La Sierra Ave at El Sobrante Rd. | 12,200 | < 501 | 81 | 171 | 66.2 |
| Van Buren Blvd. at Mockingbird Canyon Rd. | 24,540 | 61 | 127 | 271 | 69.2 |
| Alessandro Blvd. at West Frontage Rd. | 21,126 | 56 | 115 | 246 | 68.6 |
| Felspar St. at Galena St. | 21,256 | 56 | 116 | 247 | 68.6 |
| Iowa Ave. at Center St. | 15,200 | < 50 | 93 | 197 | 67.2 |
| Market St. at Via Cerro | 13,400 | < 50 | 86 | 182 | 66.6 |
| Mission Blvd. at Etiwanda Ave. | 27,000 | 65 | 135 | 289 | 69.7 |
| N. Main St. at Placentia Ln. | 15,500 | < 50 | 94 | 200 | 67.2 |
| Riverview Dr. at Mission Blvd. | 12,618 | < 50 | 83 | 175 | 66.4 |
| Sierra Ave. at Armstrong Rd. | 11,700 | < 50 | 79 | 166 | 66.0 |
| Van Buren Blvd. at Jurupa Rd. | 22,714 | 58 | 121 | 258 | 68.9 |
| McCall Blvd. at Sun City Blvd. | 10,500 | < 50 | 74 | 155 | 65.6 |
| Newport Rd. at Murrieta Rd. | 24,200 | 61 | 126 | 269 | 69.2 |
| Palm Dr. at Dillon Rd. | 17,600 | < 50 | 102 | 218 | 67.8 |
| Murrieta Hot Springs Rd. at Margarita Rd. | 11,528 | < 50 | 78 | 165 | 66.0 |
| McCall Blvd. at Sherman Ave. | 10,252 | < 50 | 73 | 152 | 65.5 |
| Ramon Rd. at Bob Hope Dr | 20,266 | 54 | 112 | 239 | 68.4 |
| Van Buren Blvd. at I-215 | 24,900 | 62 | 128 | 274 | 69.3 |
| Van Buren Blvd. at Suttles Dr. | 29,500 | 68 | 143 | 306 | 70.0 |
| Green River Rd. at Fresno Rd. | 13,000 | <50 | 84 | 178 | 66.5 |
| Serfas Club Dr. at Pinecrest Dr. | 10,800 | < 50 | 75 | 158 | 65.7 |
| Grand Ave at Baldwin Blvd. | 12,500 | < 50 | 82 | 174 | 66.3 |
| Limonite Ave. at Etiwanda Ave | 17,300 | < 50 | 101 | 215 | 67.7 |
| Stetson Ave. at Dartmouth St. | 19,284 | < 50 | 109 | 231 | 68.2 |
| Washington St. at Fred Waring Dr. | 23,610 | 60 | 124 | 264 | 69.1 |
| Indian Ave. at Dillon Rd. | 11,890 | < 50 | 80 | 168 | 66.1 |
| La Sierra Ave. at Cleveland Ave. | 10,190 | < 50 | 72 | 152 | 65.4 |
| Van Buren Blvd. at Ridgeway Ave. | 34,864 | 76 | 160 | 342 | 70.8 |
| Palm Dr. at Varner Rd. | 13,168 | < 50 | 85 | 180 | 66.5 |
| Van Buren Blvd. at Canyonview Dr. | 26,248 | 64 | 133 | 284 | 69.5 |
| Cajalco Rd. at Haines St. | 27,448 | 65 | 137 | 292 | 69.7 |
| Rubidoux Blvd. at 30th St. | 20,840 | 55 | 114 | 243 | 68.5 |
| Newport Rd at Avenida De Cortez | 14,176 | < 50 | 89 | 189 | 66.9 |
| Cajalco Rd. at Brown St. | 13,124 | < 50 | 85 | 179 | 66.5 |
| Mission Blvd. at Rubidoux Blvd. | 25,420 | 62 | 130 | 278 | 69.4 |
| Van Buren Blvd. at Clay St. | 46,690 | 91 | 194 | 416 | 72.0 |
| Grand Ave. at Stoneman St. | 10,166 | < 50 | 72 | 151 | 65.4 |
| Magnolia Ave. at McKinley St. | 16,548 | < 50 | 98 | 209 | 67.5 |
| Mission Blvd. at Valley Wy. | 16,708 | < 50 | 99 | 210 | 67.6 |
| Rubidoux Blvd. at 34th St. | 25,434 | 62 | 130 | 278 | 69.4 |
| Limonite Ave. at Clay St. | 15,642 | < 50 | 95 | 201 | 67.3 |
| Mission Blvd. at Glen St. | 10,470 | < 50 | 73 | 154 | 65.5 |
| McCall Blvd. at Bradley Rd. | 11,112 | < 50 | 76 | 161 | 65.8 |
| Limonite Ave. at Collins St. | 15,746 | < 50 | 95 | 202 | 67.3 |
| Van Buren Blvd. at Studio Pl. | 34,218 | 75 | 158 | 338 | 70.7 |
| Bundy Canyon Rd. at Sellers Rd. | 10,092 | < 50 | 72 | 151 | 65.4 |
| Magnolia Ave. at Byron St. | 15,856 | < 50 | 96 | 203 | 67.3 |
| Limonite Ave. at Downey Ave. | 24,068 | 60 | 125 | 268 | 69.0 |
| Mission Blvd. at Avalon St. | 26,022 | 63 | 132 | 282 | 69.5 |
| Mission Blvd. at Twining St. | 15,528 | < 50 | 94 | 200 | 67.3 |
| Stetson Ave. at Yale St. | 12,702 | < 50 | 83 | 175 | 66.4 |
| Etiwanda Ave. at Iberia St. | 18,206 | < 50 | 105 | 223 | 67.9 |
| El Sobrante Rd. at Cajalco Rd. | 6,112 | < 50 | < 50 | 108.6 | 63.2 |
| Wood Rd. at Gentian Ave. | 7,004 | < 50 | 57.4 | 118.7 | 63.8 |
| Corydon St. at Grand Ave. | 9,600 | < 50 | 69.6 | 145.9 | 65.2 |
| Scott Rd. at Murrieta Rd. | 7,300 | < 50 | 58.8 | 121.9 | 64.0 |
| Archibald Ave. at River Rd. | 6,500 | < 50 | 54.8 | 113 | 63.5 |
| Archibald Ave. at Cloverdale Rd. | 9,100 | < 50 | 67.3 | 140.8 | 64.9 |
| Center St. at Commercial St. | 8,100 | < 50 | 62.6 | 130.5 | 64.4 |
| Center St. at Stephen Ave. | 7,100 | < 50 | 57.8 | 119.7 | 63.8 |
| Iowa Ave. at La Cadena Dr. E | 9,400 | < 50 | 68.7 | 143.9 | 65.1 |
| Mission Blvd. at Pyrite St. | 7,344 | < 50 | 59 | 122.4 | 64.0 |
| Mission Blvd. at Conning St. | 9,070 | < 50 | 67.2 | 140.5 | 64.9 |
| Mission Blvd. at Milliken Ave. | 8,200 | < 50 | 63.1 | 130.5 | 64.5 |
| Pedley Rd. at Jurupa Dr. | 7,100 | < 50 | 57.8 | 119.7 | 63.8 |
| Bradley Rd. at Cherry Hills Blvd. | 6,420 | < 50 | 54.4 | 112.1 | 63.4 |
| Mc Call Blvd. at Hillpointe Dr. | 6,466 | < 50 | 54.7 | 112.7 | 63.4 |
| Gilman Springs Rd. at SH-79 | 6,726 | < 50 | 56 | 115.6 | 63.6 |
| Simpson Rd. at Patterson Ave. | 8,000 | < 50 | 62.2 | 129.4 | 64.4 |
| Beaumont Ave. at Cherry Valley Blvd. | 8,500 | < 50 | 64.5 | 134.7 | 64.6 |
| Highland Spring Ave. at Brookside Ave. | 6,700 | < 50 | 55.8 | 115.3 | 63.6 |
| Redlands Blvd. at San Timoteo Canyon Rd. | 6,162 | < 50 | 53.1 | 109.2 | 63.2 |
| Dillon Rd. at Long Canyon Rd. | 9,800 | < 50 | 70.5 | 147.8 | 65.3 |
| Jefferson St. at Fred Waring Dr. | 8,864 | < 50 | 66.2 | 138.4 | 64.8 |
| Central Ave. at Sycamore Canyon Blvd. | 9,842 | < 50 | 70.7 | 148.3 | 65.3 |
| Murrieta Rd. at Garboni Rd. | 7,966 | < 50 | 62 | 129.1 | 64.3 |
| Reche Canyon Rd. at Keissel Rd. | 7,606 | < 50 | 60.3 | 125.2 | 64.1 |
| Cajalco Rd. at Gustin Rd. | 8,912 | < 50 | 66.4 | 138.9 | 64.8 |
| Wood Rd. at Van Buren Blvd. | 8,500 | < 50 | 64.5 | 134.7 | 64.6 |
| Central St. at Palomar St. | 7,000 | < 50 | 57.3 | 118.6 | 63.8 |
| Stanford St. at Mayberry Ave. | 9,300 | < 50 | 68.2 | 142.8 | 65.0 |
| Temescal Canyon Rd. at Minnesota Rd. | 8,400 | < 50 | 64.1 | 133.6 | 64.6 |
| Jurupa Rd. at Van Buren Blvd. | 9,534 | < 50 | 69.3 | 145.2 | 65.1 |
| Mission Blvd. at Soto Ave. | 8,600 | < 50 | 65 | 135.7 | 64.7 |
| Menifee Rd. at SH-74 | 6,300 | < 50 | 53.8 | 110.8 | 63.3 |
| Simpson Rd. at Lindenberger Rd. | 7,400 | < 50 | 59.3 | 123 | 64.0 |
| Ramona Express Way at Warren Rd. | 9,172 | < 50 | 67.6 | 141.6 | 65.0 |
| Cajalco Rd. at Gavilin Rd. | 9,416 | < 50 | 68.7 | 144 | 65.1 |
| Ontario Ave. at El Cerrito Rd. | 7,114 | < 50 | 57.9 | 119.9 | 63.9 |
| Dillon Rd. at Mountain View Rd. | 8,176 | < 50 | 63 | 131.3 | 64.5 |
| Ontario Ave. at Piute Creek | 7,146 | < 50 | 58.1 | 120.2 | 63.9 |
| Mission Blvd. at Lindsay St. | 8,526 | < 50 | 64.6 | 134.9 | 64.6 |
| Jurupa Rd. at Rigel WY. | 7,682 | < 50 | 60.6 | 126 | 64.2 |
| Valley WY. at Jurupa Rd. | 9,732 | < 50 | 70.2 | 147.2 | 65.2 |
| Murrieta Rd. at E Winchester Rd. | 8,588 | < 50 | 64.9 | 135.6 | 64.7 |
| Murrieta Rd. at Ridgemoor Rd. | 9,850 | < 50 | 70.7 | 148.3 | 65.3 |
| Cajalco Rd. at Clark St. | 7,736 | < 50 | 60.9 | 126.6 | 64.2 |
| Rubidoux Blvd. at 28th St. | 9,408 | < 50 | 68.7 | 143.9 | 65.1 |
| Reche Canyon Rd. at Reche Vista Dr. | 7,800 | < 50 | 61.2 | 127.3 | 64.3 |
| Archibald Ave. at Schleisman Rd. | 7,278 | < 50 | 58.7 | 121.7 | 64.0 |
| Stetson Ave. at Columbia Ave. | 9,662 | < 50 | 69.8 | 146.5 | 65.2 |
| Mission Blvd. at Glen St. | 8,830 | < 50 | 66.1 | 138.1 | 64.8 |
| Mc Call Blvd. at Aspel Rd. | 7,888 | < 50 | 61.6 | 128.2 | 64.3 |
| Wood Rd. at Mariposa Ave. | 9,730 | < 50 | 70.1 | 147.1 | 65.2 |
| Pyrite St. at Mission Blvd. | 8,648 | < 50 | 64.4 | 134.3 | 64.6 |
| Reche Canyon rd. at Mercadante Ln. | 7,562 | < 50 | 60.1 | 124.8 | 64.1 |
| Mission Blvd. at Pedley Rd. | 9,258 | < 50 | 68 | 142.4 | 65.0 |
| Stetson Ave. at Stanford St. | 7,502 | < 50 | 59.8 | 124.1 | 64.1 |
| Market St. at Agua Mansa Rd. | 9,796 | < 50 | 70.4 | 147.8 | 65.2 |
| Hamner Ave. at Mission Blvd. | 8,286 | < 50 | 63.5 | 132.4 | 64.5 |
| SH-243 at Pinecrest Ave. | 6,500 | < 50 | 100.7 | 209.2 | 66.7 |
| SH-79 at Auld Rd. | 9,734 | 65.6 | 129.3 | 272.5 | 68.4 |
| SH-60 at I-15 | 139,000 | 345 | 741 | 1595 | 80.0 |
| SH-60 at Market St. | 80,000 | 240 | 513 | 1104 | 77.6 |
| I-215 at Fair Isle Dr. | 143,000 | 352 | 755 | 1625 | 80.1 |
| SH-60 at Jack Rabbit Tr. | 30,500 | 129 | 271 | 581 | 73.4 |
| I-10 at San Timoteo Canyon Rd. | 48,000 | 172 | 357 | 785 | 75.4 |
| I-10 at Washington St. | 44,500 | 164 | 348 | 747 | 75.0 |
| I-15 at Magnolia Ave. | 87,000 | 253 | 542 | 1167 | 78.0 |
| SH-74 at Briggs Rd. | 17,612 | 92 | 189 | 403 | 71.0 |
| Source: LSA Associates, Inc. 1999. Traffic Noise within 50 feet of roadways requires a site specific analysis. | |||||
Figure 1: Projected Traffic Noise Contours-Freeway (10 Lanes)

Figure 2: Projected Traffic Noise Contours-Freeway (6 Lanes)

Figure 3: Projected Traffic Noise Contours-Expressway (6 Lanes)

Figure 4: Projected Traffic Noise Contours-Urban Arterial (6Lanes)

Figure 5: Projected Traffic Noise Contours-Arterial Highway (4 Lanes)

Figure 6: Projected Traffic Noise Contours-Major Highway (4 Lanes)

Figure 7: Projected Traffic Noise Contours-Mountain Arterial (4 Lanes)

Figure 8: Projected Traffic Noise Contours-Secondary Highway (4 Lanes)

Figure 9: Projected Traffic Noise Contours-Collector Street (2 Lanes)

Figure 10: Existing Railroad Noise Contours-Coronita Area

Figure 11: Existing Railroad Noise Contours-Near Van Buren and Limonite


Figure 12: Existing Railroad Noise Contours-North of Palm Desert

MEMO: Requirements for Determining and Mitigating Non-transportation Noise Source Impacts to Residential Properties.
APPLICATION:
This document is intended to provide guidelines for the determination of community noise impact due to non-transportation (hereafter known as "stationary") noise sources. Noise sources covered by this standard include, but are not limited to: industrial facilities, mining activities, loading dock activities, loud speakers operation, sporting events, musical performances, well pumps, equipment, vehicles operated off the public roadways, or any noise producing activities associated with a permanent fixed base of operation (hereafter referred to as the "facility"). Temporary construction activities are not covered by the standard.
NOISE STANDARDS FOR STATIONARY NOISE SOURCES:
Facility-related noise, as projected to any portion of any surrounding property containing a "habitable dwelling, hospital, school, library or nursing home", must not exceed the following worst-case noise levels.
A) 45 dB(A) - 10 minute noise equivalent level ("leq"), between the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. (nighttime standard).
B) 65 dB(A) - 10 minute leq, between 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. (daytime standard).
REQUIREMENTS FOR DETERMINATION OF COMMUNITY NOISE IMPACT:
1. Noise originating from operations within the facility grounds shall be treated as "stationary" noise sources for which this standard will apply.
2. Noise Modeling Methodology: Noise predictions are to be made by an engineer, acoustical consultant, or other similar professional with experience in predicting community noise exposure using standard methods and practices of the noise consulting industry.
3. Required Modeling Parameters for Stationary Sources:
i. Stationary sources are to be modeled as "point" sources.
ii. Mobile point sources are to be modeled as emanating from the acoustical centroid of the activity, or at its closest approach to potentially impacted residential property lines, which ever yields the worst-case results.
iii. Noise modeling for each piece of acoustically significant equipment, process or activity must be based on Reference Noise Levels (RNL). RNL may be obtained directly from the manufacturer (in the case of equipment) or generated from field studies. Regardless, the data must be representative of worst-case conditions. Directionality of the noise source must be taken into consideration if applicable.
iv. Predicted noise levels are to be expressed in germs of worst-case "equivalent continuous sound levels" [or, Leq] averaged over a ten minute period.
v. For modeling purposes, receivers are assumed to be positioned at the property line boundary at an elevation of five feet off the ground.
vi. Terrain conditions for modeling noise propagation: Assumptions regarding ground effects, atmospheric absorption and other forms of noise attenuation must be fully justified.
NOISE REPORT FORMAT AND REQUIRED SUBMITTALS:
The noise Consultant's findings and recommendations must be submitted for review, and receive approval from, the Office of Industrial Hygiene. The resulting report must incorporate the requirements above and, at a minimum, contain the following information:
a) an adequate and accurate characterization of the current ambient noise environment;
b) a clear description of the proposed facility and its activities including a step-by-step flow chart of manufacturing processes if applicable;
c) the identity and characterization of all acoustically significant equipment and/or activities;
d) a discussion of analytical methodology and parameters used for noise modeling;
e) a table containing reference noise data accompanied by a detailed description of how it was obtained;
f) the facilities hours of operation;
g) a discussion of anticipated production volume, how it is expected to change over time and how such change will effect community noise;
h) a discussion of worst-case unmitigated noise impact;
i) a discussion of mitigation (if necessary);
j) a printed copy of computer input/output (if available) or manual calculations clearly illustrating the rationale for the Consultant's conclusions.
In addition, the final noise report must contain a scaled map(s) defining the acoustical contours surrounding the facility. Minimally, this map(s) must show:
a) The facility relative to the residential properties surrounding it. Include both unincorporated and incorporated (any adjoining Cities) area surrounding the project and potentially affected by project-related noise.
b) The 65 dB(A) 10 minute Leq noise contour reflecting the anticipated "worst-case" conditions between the hours of 7AM - 10 PM (daytime hours).
c) The 45 dB(A) 10 minute Leq noise contour reflecting the anticipated "worst-case" conditions between the hours of 10 PM - 7AM (nighttime hours).
d) The location and number of residential structures located within these contours.
MEMO: Requirements for Determining and Mitigating Traffic Noise Impacts to Residential Structures.
NOISE STANDARDS:
1. The Noise Element of the General Plan indicates that to avoid future noise hazard, the maximum capacity design standard for highways and major roads will be used for determining the maximum future noise level or, in the case of freeways and airports, the estimated conditions 20 years in the future.
2. The interior noise levels in residential dwellings shall not exceed 45 Ldn/CNEL.
3. The exterior noise level shall not exceed 65 Ldn/CNEL.
4. Required Noise Prediction Model – Traffic Noise: FHWA RD 77-108 Highway Traffic Prediction Model, Sound 32 or the equivalent.
REQUIRED TRAFFIC NOISE MODELING PARAMETERS:
1. Roadway Classification: All roadways must be classified into one of the following categories as defined in the General Plan: Secondary, Major, Arterial, Urban Arterial, Expressway, Freeway, and Specific Plan Road.
2. Roadway Traffic Volume: All roadways must be modeled using Average Daily Trip (ADT) Level of Service “C” design capacities. For roadways classified by the General Plan as variable, future build-out traffic volumes must be obtained from the County’s Transportation Department
3. or in the case of freeways, from Caltrans.
4. Required vehicle mix.
• Freeways: Vehicle mix information must be obtained from Caltrans.
• Roadways designated as major, arterial highways, or expressways:
| VEHICLE | OVERALL % | DAY (7AM-7PM) % | EVENING (7PM-10PM) % | NIGHT (10PM-7AM) % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Auto | 92 | 69.5 | 12.9 | 9.6 |
| Medium Truck | 3 | 1.44 | 0.06 | 1.5 |
| Heavy Truck | 5 | 2.4 | 0.1 | 2.5 |
• Roadways designated as secondary, collectors, or smaller:
| VEHICLE | OVERALL % | DAY (7AM-7PM) % | EVENING (7PM-10PM) % | NIGHT (10PM-7AM) % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Auto | 97.4 | 73.6 | 13.6 | 10.22 |
| Medium Truck | 1.84 | 0.9 | 0.04 | 0.9 |
| Heavy Truck | 0.74 | 0.35 | 0.04 | 0.35 |
5. Traffic Speed: For County roads assume an average traffic speed of 40 MPH. For freeways, contact CALTRANS and use what speed they recommend.
6. Terrain conditions for modeling noise propagation: Assume “hard site” conditions in determining noise propagation (no more than 3 dB of attenuation per doubling of distance between source and receiver).
7. Noise attenuation attributed to standard residential architecture: It is assumed that standard residential design (with windows closed) will provide no more than 20 dB (A) of attenuation. Additional mitigation must be demonstrated via modeling.
8. Receiver placement for modeling exterior noise levels (unmitigated): Noise levels must be estimated at the exterior face of the nearest residence at an elevation of five feet above the finished pad.
• Receiver placement for noise barrier design: Set back: Barrier calculations shall be based on a hypothetical outdoor receiver located ten (10) feet behind the intervening noise barrier.
• Receiver height: Initial calculations shall be based on a receiver height of five (5) feet above the ground. If these calculations result in a barrier less than or equal to six (6) feet in height, no further barrier calculations are necessary and this shall be selected as the required wall height.
9. However, if the resulting barrier height is calculated to be greater than six feet, it shall be re-calculated using a receiver height of three (3) feet. The resulting re-calculated wall height shall be then selected as the required wall height.
10. Receiver placement for architectural-based (indoor) noise mitigation – first floor: First floor interior noise level predictions are to be calculated assuming a hypothetical receiver is located in the center of the room nearest the noise source and elevated 5 feet above the pad (finished floor).
NOISE REPORT FORMAT AND REQUIRED SUBMITTALS:
The noise Consultants findings and recommendations must be submitted for review, and receive approval from, the Office of Industrial Hygiene. The resulting report must incorporate the requirements above and, at a minimum, contain the following information: a) a clear description of the proposed project; b) the identity and characterization of all acoustically significant roadways; c) a discussion of analytical methodology and parameters used for noise modeling; d) information obtained from applying requirements 6-10 (above); e) a discussion of mitigation (if necessary) including a clear diagram illustrating noise barrier placement; f) a printed copy of computer input/output (if available).
In addition to the report, Industrial Hygiene must be provided with the following depending on the design stage of the project. The first item that must be provided is a scaled map (blue-line) of the project. This map must clearly illustrate lot boundaries and the relative location of all acoustically significant roadways. Topographical elevations for lots and roadway centerlines must be included. Second, if architectural-based mitigation is necessary, and if the project has progressed to the point where plans for the homes have been drawn, copies must be provided (floor plans and exterior elevation drawings). Additionally, an updated blue-line showing exact pad location and finished floor elevation must be included.
MEMO: Potential Studies Requiring Input from Department of Public Health
I. STUDIES
Except for WECS (Wind Energy Conversion Systems) Noise, Department of Public Health input is discretionary as determined by the Planning Department. Regularly, the Planning Department requests Department of Public Health reviews concerning the acoustical issues associated with a project. Less frequently, the Department may be requested to comment on ground vibration from trains (may apply to noise sensitive receptor within 1,000 feet of a rail corridor) and release of silica dust from sand and gravel pit operations. In addition, in response to community and planning commissioners comments, the Planning Department may request Department reviews of projects having the following associated issues: nuisance dust, cement dust, electromagnetic fields from power lines, and asbestos dust.
A. Noise Appraisals
Noise appraisals fall into three groups each with distinct criteria; Transportation noise receptors, e.g. tracts receiving noise from highways and airports; stationary noise sources, e.g. projects emitting significant noise impacting neighboring communities; and Wind Energy Conversion Systems noise (WECS or Windturbine Farms). An applicant should be aware that a given project may fall into more than one group. The following outlines the minimum criteria associated with each group.
1. Transportation noise receptors:
(a) Interior noise levels in residential dwellings shall not exceed 45 Ldn (or CNEL).
(b) Exterior noise levels shall not exceed 65 Ldn (or CNEL).
(c) Acoustical parameters are outlined in the memo of Dec. 21, 1990 (contact the Office of Industrial Hygiene).
2. Stationary noise sources:
During hours of 7 A.M. to 10 p.m. and 10 p.m. to 7 A.M., the noise levels shall not exceed 65 and 45 dB,A weighted ten minute Leq, respectively, as projected to any portion of a lot with occupied residence.
3. WECS Noise.:
WECS shall comply with criteria established by Ordinance No. 348.258 and Resolution No. 93-378.
4. Consultants Expertise:
The acoustical study demonstrating compliance with these categories shall be performed by a noise consultant with at least two years experience in acoustical design and mitigation. The consultant shall be able to utilize FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model and Sound 32. Preferably the consultant shall be a member of the Institute of Noise Control Engineering or a Certified Industrial Hygienist.
B. Other Studies
For other studies requiring our input, the applicant shall contact Industrial Hygiene for guidelines in providing a study prior to conducting the assessment or study.
II. FEES
Our current man-hour fee (subject to change by ordinance) is $95 per hour devoted to the project including review and comment, verbally and in writing. Any time consumed by traveling to and attending meetings (including public hearings) on behalf of the project is also included. In addition, incidental expenses such as mileage at .29/mile, meals, lodging, and miscellaneous transportation expenses may be incurred. Note, the incidental expenses other than mileage are rarely utilized.
III. DEPOSITS
For WECS, a $500 deposit is required. Frequently, expenses exceed this deposit and additional deposits are requested prior to completion of reviews and participation at public hearings. For all others, a $1,500 deposit is requested. This is generally sufficient, unless the project is complex and/or controversial, involving many revisions, and/or attendance at meetings.